Monthly Archives: October 2022

Girl Given Access to Dress and Undress in Boy’s Locker Room

Posted on by

   In Rural Southern Illinois, a teacher has been put on administrative leave for not allowing a biological female to use the Boy’s locker room to change her clothes.

There is an Illinois law that allows one to dress in the Locker room of the sex they identify themselves as.  Here is a philosophical problem.  How can you determine if someone identifies as a boy or a girl if you cannot define what boy or girl means?  What is a boy, or girl?

If it is not defined by chromosomes and genitals, what is it defined by?  Are you male if you are aggressive or stronger?  What if you have male genitals but are passive and weaker?  Does that make you a girl?

What is it you identify as if you say you identify as a boy or girl?  We must have a clear definition to even begin to make any kind of judgment call.  

Truth is not something we make up internally it is something we discover externally.  What facts are used to determine gender?  Truth is a faithful representation of the facts.  It has been easy for years to determine male and female by genitals and chromosomes.  We still do that with every other animal species except humans.

You don’t have to interview horses to determine their gender.  You simply examine their genitals.

Before we can truly determine if someone identifies as male or female, there must of necessity be a definition of what males and females are!  Otherwise we are simply embracing fantasy, feeling, opinion or delusion as fact with no objective grounds to make a determination.

New York Supreme Court reverses Vaccine Mandates

Posted on by

Many people in New York and across the United States lost their jobs for not getting the COVID 19 “Vaccine Shot”.  The New York Supreme Court has now ruled that workers must be rehired and paid for time lost because of these illegal mandates.

In the summary of the decision that I read, the court stated that the vaccine neither prevented getting the disease nor did it prevent the spreading of the disease.

These statements were considered to be misinformation and got you banned from speaking in the public forum through social media just a few months ago.  You were labeled some kind of denier or anti vaccine proponent or some other label that brings with it the sense of public rejection and an anti science label!

Could it be possible to oppose a bad vaccine and approve of others?  Or is that not a possibility?  If a fraction of the deaths reported to VAERS, which is the voluntary reporting service for adverse effects from the vaccine, are truly related to these vaccines, these would be the deadliest vaccines in history.

So now the court is making decisions by declaring that which was loudly and arrogantly proclaimed as misinformation to be true.

The frightening reality is someone had authority to disseminate their own information worldwide and had the cooperation of social media and the press to suppress other opinions which in reality were more accurate than what the official experts were telling us!

We just wanted to be able to make our own informed decision on the serious matter!  Once again it is both inadequate and disingenuous to say simply that the vaccine is “safe and effective!”

Truth on Vaccines is Seeping Through Cracks in the Media Barricades

Posted on by

You have certainly heard advertisements for Pharmaceuticals on TV where they tell you all the benefits until the end of the Ad when someone reads off all the possible adverse effects faster than the speed of light in a way that is incomprehensible to the listener.  They are covering their liability by advising you ahead of time what might go wrong.

Did you notice there have been no such warnings when promoting the COVID-19 “Vaccines”?  They have simply been described as safe and effective.  The reason they have no disclaimers is because they were prescribed under the Emergency Powers Act.  Therefore, they are immune to lawsuit as long as there is no treatment for the virus.  Thus, it seems treatments were blocked or rejected during the early days of the pandemic to preserve immunity to liability.  Some have contended that lives were sacrificed to maintain this immunity to legal action.  Early on, the Doctors who were asking why we’re not treating people had their voices silenced and their opinions banned from public display. 

However, now we are seeing adverse effects of cytotoxic proteins, ganglia clots being observed by embalmers that were never seen like this before the pandemic/vaccine era, major upticks in myocarditis and pericarditis among young men particularly and a major uptick in deaths in general reported by insurance companies that are unrelated to COVID.

A report I read today said the effectiveness of the vaccines deteriorates after 70 to about 90 days depending on which vaccine.  At that point some even report a negative effectiveness which means you are more likely to get the disease if vaccinated.  If this hasn’t been totally substantiated yet, it still would have been nice to know even preliminary findings before decisions are made that can alter your life.

This is one example.  I remember hearing an early Cleveland Clinic study that indicated it would not be useful to receive the vaccine if you had already recovered from COVID.  This information and studies like this were not easily found.

The mantra has been safe and effective.  THAT’S IT!!  Very disingenuous!  At least we should have been hearing some incomprehensible warning at the end of vaccine promotions warning of the possible adverse effects.  Now we begin to hear when it’s too late for many to make their own informed decision.

When government decides what can be heard and what is truth we are no longer in a free society.  That was what happened during this pandemic.  William Federer’s book “Socialism” is subtitled, How the deep state capitalizes on crises to consolidate control.  Very telling and seemingly applicable to what we have just gone through.

Climate Change and Grand Solar Minimum/Maximum

Posted on by

   On a recent trip overseas I ran into a friend who is an engineer dealing with electrical power generation among other projects.  In talking with him he reminded me of a topic we talked about several years ago.  I have been skeptical about the absolute terms in which we are fed climate change alarms.  As I have said before I have lived through the announcement that we were on the brink of an ice age in the sixties, food rationing by 1980 and ice cap melting by 2013.  All because man is not controlling CO2 emissions.

Shortly after I came home from overseas in 2019, I heard declarations that the earth would be uninhabitable in 18 months.  None of these warnings have proved reliable.  My friend told me that patterns in the Sun’s magnetic fields appear to have much more to do with weather patterns than any manmade emissions or cows passing gas.

Several scientists have made observations on the topic of the Grand Solar Minimum or Maximum and if you really want to be informed on causes of weather patterns or Climate Change it would behoove you to do some research in this area.

I will try to give you some links in the near future.  Happy Research!!